top of page
Stacked Vintage Books

Sharing Insights on Building Feminist Futures

Here are some insights and reflections on building feminist futures. We welcome contributions to our publications page. Please feel free to send your written reflections, podcasts or other materials to rtiessen@uottawa.ca for consideration for publication.

Building Feminist Futures for Women, Peace and Security

SUSTAINING THE WPS AGENDA: 5 LESSONS FROM WOMEN ON THE FRONTLINES

Written by Jennifer Ayewa Donkoh (PhD student, University of Ottawa)


The world is experiencing a collective backslide of women’s already-meager gains in equality, exacerbated by the uptick in wars and conflicts that have put countless women in unsafe and precarious situations. Globally, 600 million women and girls are affected by war yet, the percentage of women peace negotiators remain abysmally low at below 10%, proving that efforts to meaningfully include women in peacebuilding processes have not been successful. This is against a backdrop of an apparent chasm between local and grassroots women’s organizations and donors even though the latter have proven instrumental for  the women peace and security (WPS) agenda. Still, projects like the Women of Courage, Women Peace and Security Project (WOC) are a reminder of the indisputable impact local organizations can have in WPS.  

WOC was brought to life by 6 local organizations: Organización Femenina Popular (OFP) in Colombia; Héritiers de la Justice (HJ) in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC); Wi’am: Palestinian Conflict Transformation Centre in Palestine; and the South Sudan Council of Churches (SSCC) in South Sudan. The project was implemented in partnership with KAIROS, a Canadian ecumenical association, and with the support of Global Affairs Canada (GAC). WOC impacted the lives of over 36,000 women supporting them through  healing from gender-based violence, political instability and harmful patriarchal norms. Reflecting on the factors behind the project’s success, Rachel Warden, Partnerships Manager at KAIROS, identifies several core strategies that proved decisive: foregrounding local knowledge; providing long-term core funding for local organizations; recognizing the crucial role of survivors; and strategically engaging male allies. In this zeitgeist of spirited arbitrations on the protraction of policies and programs that promote women’s rights, this article highlights the voices of women at the front lines and serves as a reminder of the indispensability of WPS. These approaches offer a model for a WPS agenda that seeks not merely to meet participation targets, but to produce lasting structural and systemic change:

  1. Foreground Local Knowledge and Feminism(s)

When given the opportunity, women at the grassroots have proven to be the most effective advocates for peacebuilding. Their contextual knowledge and affiliations become instrumental in supporting and ensuring women’s safety and security even in the most precarious situations. Therefore, local epistemologies of wellbeing, empowerment, and feminism  should not only be included in WPS programing but serve as its basis. Foregrounding local knowledge will ensure funding and other technical support go where it is most needed, and where it will likely make the most impact. WOC operationalized this concept by employing an intersectional approach in their programing and by acknowledging the leadership of their partner local agencies. KAIROS credits the leadership of their partners for the project’s advancement despite obstacles like the COVID-19 pandemic and heightened socio-political volatility. For instance, seeing that their beneficiaries had lost access to care providers as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, OFP developed a  Purple Tents strategy to ensure safe spaces for women to access psychosocial support.  Hence, centering local knowledge puts the best women on the job, especially those who can utilize this knowledge to persevere through setbacks. 

  1. Funding the grassroots long-term is crucial 

Even well-meaning WPS strategies tend to make grassroots funding a footnote. Impactful grassroots organizations sometimes miss out on crucial funding either because they are in precarious contexts, or they may not necessarily have the administrative infrastructure to meet donor requirements. When grassroots organizations do gain access to funds, they are often tied to singular projects and not for long-term organizing and sustainability. Recognizing this, KAIROS advocated for flexible funding requirements for their partner grassroots organizations and ensured that core funding was sustained even at times when contextual precarity affected operations. For instance, when COVID-19 pandemic restrictions  made program implementation difficult, core funding from GAC through KAIROS sustained WOC grassroots organizations, supporting their transition to safer means of project execution and organizational sustainability. Furthermore, KAIROS has continued their partnership with the local organizations through the  Women Peacebuilders at the Nexus of Climate, Conflict and Gender project, which was launched in 2025, further extending crucial support for the organizations. 

  1. Survivors are leaders

Despite suffering some of the most horrendous atrocities in times of crises,  when provided the needed support, women become vital advocates for WPS. Some of them go on to become avid human rights defenders and even sometimes lead peace processes and negotiations. Evidently, survivors should not be an afterthought in grassroots engagements towards WPS. Aside from their rich contextual knowledge, their standpoint is an inevitable starting point for rigorous post-crises rebuilding. The participants and partners of the WOC project are a testament to the fact that survivors can become a powerful force for WPS. Empowered by the psychosocial support provided by WOC, beneficiaries in DRC and Colombia became mobilizers of women and advocates for women’s rights. Some beneficiaries and participants of SSCC’s Women’s Link initiative in South Sudan credit the organizations empowerment for their taking up of leadership roles in governance and conflict resolution.  

  1. Local does not have to mean small

Locally founded organizations and movements often begin small, but their impact tends to be tremendous. They tackle niche and contextual issues affecting their communities, creating effective systems for support and perceivable positive change. As already discussed, local knowledge is essential, and local peacebuilders deserve a seat at the table for wider WPS discourses. Consequently, platforms should be created to enable local peace builders to share their knowledge and expertise. WOC ensured this by facilitating South-South exchanges between local partner organizations and movements. Representatives of these organizations also made their voices heard on international platforms such as the UN Commission on the Status of Women (CSW).

  1. Male allyship is essential

The import of male allyship in WPS should not be ignored. This is a strategic appropriation of the contextual deference afforded men, where their voices are sometimes more valued and the most likely to be impactful .  Palestine’s  Wi’am engaged men of status in communities to be spokespersons for women’s rights in a context where such advocacy would otherwise not be widely well-received. The WOC project also successfully brought on male allies who felt moved for change after the trauma of violence suffered by their female relatives and loved ones. This was the case for Colombia’s OFP, whose members recruited their male relatives for the cause. Evidently, men bring more than numbers to the WPS agenda.  

 WOC is proof that contextualized WPS strategies that prioritize the grassroots are effective, impactful and worthy of protracted support. While this is only a snapshot of the extensive work that went into the project, it shows that for WPS programming to go beyond band aid solutions, women on the front lines should be centered.  

Sources

KAIROS. https://kairoscanada.org/

KAIROS. (2024). Women of Courage: Women, Peace and Security Program. https://kairoscanada.org/read-kairos-wps-six-transformative-years-at-a-glance

KAIROS. (n.d.). Women Peacebuilders at the Nexus of Climate, Conflict and Gender. https://kairoscanada.org/what-we-do/gender-justice/wp-ccg

KAIROS. (n.d.). https://kairoscanada.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Year-Three-At-a-Glance.pdf

Thirikwa, J. (2023, April 21). Story of Change: Hon. Christine’s participation and influence in transitions from conflict in South Sudan. KAIROS.

 https://kairoscanada.org/christine-anita-phillip-story-of-change

What does it mean to build feminist futures? 

​

By Rebecca Tiessen, April 9, 2026

 

The desire to build feminist futures has a long history of more than 50 years with advocates in the early 1970s demanding that ‘the future is female’. In the past 20 years, a growing and diversified commitment to promoting feminist futures can be found across scholarly, practitioner, philosophical, and even popular culture sources including the blockbuster film ‘Barbie’ in which a feminist utopia is celebrated and patriarchal norms are criticized. 

 

IWDA (International Women’s Development Agency), in 2021, cohosted a panel at the NGO 65th Commission on the Status of Women titled “Imagining and building Feminist Futures after COVID-19” and subsequently created a video on what #afeministfuturelookslike. You can view the video here: https://iwda.org.au/a-feminist-future/

 

The commitment to building feminist futures therefore has a long trajectory but the strategy to achieve feminist futures has been less clear. How do we get there? How do we build feminist futures and ensure we are creating the pathways needed to achieve a feminist vision, and what exactly do we mean by a feminist vision?

 

Over the past decade, we have invested a lot of our time and energy in discussions of feminist policies to guide a largely unarticulated vision (as well as lots of valuable critiques of the limitations of policies for achieving the feminist futures we aspire to). 

 

Feminist policies are certainly crucial to the foundation of building feminist futures but as we have seen, they lack staying power (including the demise of FFP in Sweden and more recently and perhaps inadvertently, in Canada, and the general decline of discussions around FFP globally). When feminist policies are tied to the government of the day, they are subject to changing political and economic circumstances that ensure their precarity. They may be considered ‘good to have’ but not necessary and when the tyranny of the urgent (economic growth or facing economic weaponization, increased security concerns and more) shape the priorities of the day, we see feminist commitments (even when not called explicitly feminist), quickly fall by the wayside. We need to address this reality head-on and ensure that feminist policies – policies that are linked to feminist commitments – have staying power. 

 

How we do this (ensure the longevity of feminist policies) is the focus of the latter part of this paper. First, it is important to explain what I mean by feminist policies and feminist commitments? There are three main components of what I mean by feminist: 1. Diverse and equitable representation and participation, including the valuing of voices and knowledge and a commitment to inclusion and inclusive practices to ensure diverse representation (EDI) in all spaces; 2. Making connections between the injustices that people face and the systemic and structural realities that perpetuate them, and through these connections, formulating systemic-level changes that transform practices, and 3. An ethics of care that centres people and planet over profit and power. 

 

Feminist futures therefore: centre an ethics of care in all priorities, care that can be observed through increased commitments to peace and to ending violence; prioritize just systems and processes that lead to the end of discrimination; and ensure environmental sustainability, planetary health, and sustainable livelihoods so that families and communities achieve economic wellbeing. These priorities are summarized as peace, justice, and sustainable economies. There are, of course,  more priorities that are central to building feminist futures and these include laying the foundations for building peace, advancing justice, and promoting sustainable economies and they begin with commitments to mental and physical wellbeing, improved social relationships, valuing purpose and meaning in life, and alignment with our values. 

 

The spirit of building feminist futures is grounded in rich insight and critical analysis offered across feminist scholarship and in the practical solutions including investments in programming (such as funding) and in feminist-focussed organizations that continue to champion feminist priorities.  There have been extraordinary advances in practical feminist solutions to a largely anti-feminist world with a range of innovations and impacts that are worthy of celebration. We can see the impacts of feminist leadership in women’s rights organizations that address feminist priorities on a daily basis, and we can also see impacts of feminist leadership in governments through inside activism and persistent prioritization of feminist goals, even if the policy of the day has changed. 

 

These valuable investments will, to some extent, persist even in the most difficult times of gender backlash. Feminist leaders are empowered by their growing communities of support and will continue to support the feminist priorities that lead to the justice-oriented changes they seek to address in their communities. 

 

However, there are warranted concerns and real threats beyond the anecdotes of feminist leadership because the landscape is changing rapidly. These changes can be observed in the demise of women’s equality priorities and EDI in USA, growing authoritarianism and democratic backsliding, economic weaponization, increased militarization, and more, and with these changes we see a rise in anti-gender backlash. 

 

With our priorities and goals of a building feminist futures of peace, justice and sustainable economies we do so with the deep structural, systemic and persistent patriarchal challenges noted above in mind. The challenges require ongoing work to identify, name, confront, navigate (especially since tackling these challenges is a long-term reality and resilience in the moment can be a powerful temporary priority), and ultimately to overcome. 

 

In addition to our ongoing knowledge and focus on the structural and systemic challenges, we also need to focus on building the foundations for – and pathways to -  feminist futures. Policies can help guide the design of feminist priorities but since they often lack the longevity needed to build feminist futures, we need to expand our strategies and reflect more fully on what is at the heart of - or the foundation for - building feminist futures. One of the core components of the foundation is leadership, innovation, and training of the next generation of change-makers. Focussing on leadership training for feminist futures requires diverse commitments including:

 

  1. New curriculum and training resources adopted in academic and training centres;

  2. New skills that ensure research and data collection that support feminist futures; and

  3. New communication strategies to ensure knowledge is shared with the largest audience possible to have the biggest impact.

 

Feminist scholarship has helped to centre and analyse these feminist priorities and here we draw on feminist ethics of care (Robinson, Thomson, Ruddick, Gilligan, and more); feminist flourishing (Donkoh, Swan, and Tiessen, 2025); feminist empowerment (Kabeer, Cornwall, Batliwala, Mohanty); and many more powerful analytical insights.

 

Feminist agentic approaches are situated within - and balanced with - feminist international relations and gender and development scholarship that connects the agency-focussed priorities with the realist tensions of the world we live in – the systemic and structural inequalities that perpetuate poverty, violence, climate change, and more. As Mark Carney reminded us in the 2026 WEF speech in Davos, we need to “take on the world as it is, not wait around for a world we wish it to be” but the meaning of this quote varies depending on how we interpret it and where we put our emphasis. The idea of building feminist futures demands that we acknowledge the world we live in now and that we cannot wait for a world we wish it to be. Putting the emphasis on this last part of the sentence provides a new lens for pursuing a commitment to feminist futures as it recognizes that we must be pro-active in the building of feminist futures since futures are shaped by planning and strategizing. 

 

What does building feminist futures mean to you? In a spirit of democratic, feminist knowledge-sharing, and pluriversality, we invite you to share your reflections.

 

Contributions could address: 

 

  1. The imperative for building a feminist future and the backdrop for which feminist futures are crucial (the alarming impacts of anti-gender backlash, marginalization of EDI priorities, growing xenophobia, racism, authoritarianism and more);

  2. Stories of impact and hope that highlight the kind of feminist practice that is possible, examples of impact and change that help lay the foundation of what feminist leadership can look like and the changes it can provide. As we strategize for a feminist future of peace, justice and sustainable economies, we also need to document some of the successes and outcomes that we can scale up, learn from, and advance; and

  3. New possibilities, opportunities, strategies, training and learning innovations, and transformative visions. In our pathway to building feminist futures what do we need to invest in, how do we need to do it, what do we need to keep in mind? 

 

We invite you to share your reflections on any of these three areas of focus as part of our building feminist futures series. 

 

Submission guidelines:

                                                                                                                                                                                             

  1. Submissions can be in a variety of formats: short essays, blog, case studies, poems and more or as videos submissions (reciting a poem or story), animated video stories, etc.

  2. Length: written submissions should be between 500 – 1500 words and video submissions should be no longer than 5 minutes (we ask you to share a transcript of any video or other non-written submissions)

  3. Submissions can be in French or in English

  4. Send your submissions to rtiessen@uottawa.ca

 

 

We will feature successful submissions in our inaugural blog+ series on the BuildingFeministFutures website. 

bottom of page